I’m
in a spouting nonsense mood, and the target of today’s spout is the concept of
canon. Particularly as the term applies to the concept of the fictional ‘facts’
of a fictional universe, as portrayed in various works of fiction.
The
facts of fiction. Right. It’s fundamentally an oxymoron.
Canon
in its modern meaning didn’t really matter until properties like Star Wars and
Star Trek expanded beyond their home bases in movies and TV respectively, into
books, comics, video games and tabletop games. The idea was to ensure
consistency in plot and world details, even as you had dozens, scores, if not
hundreds of different writers working on different stories in different media
more or less at the same time.
The
hardcore fans of pretty much anything love it. Love it, love it, absolutely
love it. Lap that stuff up like it’s liquid ketamine. Can’t get enough of it. Canon
makes the whole phenomenon of gatekeeping fictional properties possible. There
are few things that warm their hearts more than telling each other they’re
wrong about the canon. Few things they cherish more than pointing out errors
and inconsistencies in canon, or endlessly fan theorizing about it,
constructing great cathedrals of meaning out of throwaway lines published in,
like, a children’s picture book.
And
they shouldn’t. By god, they shouldn’t. If you really love Star Wars, or Star
Trek, or, lawd, I don’t know, My Little Pony, you should absolutely be against
the idea of canon. Reboots, remakes, retellings, alternate and parallel
universes, mashups, all of the things that destroy canon mean you get more of
the property you love. You get more and more varied stories. You get to
experience it more, fresh and new again. You should love it when content
creators throw canon to the wind.
Yet
we don’t, and I’m not sure why. I don’t think there’s anything inevitable about
canon. In fact, it’s a little weird that people cared.
There’s
no obvious reason why they would—after all, the one modern entertainment medium
where multiple writers had long worked on a shared universe was comic books,
where characters live, die, appear to die but don’t, are reborn, reincarnated,
rescued from alternate dimensions or future timelines as a matter of course. Spider-Man
has been through more incarnations than a Hindu with a death wish, there have
been more Batmans in history than there have been presidents of the United
States of America and the X-Men’s Jean Grey has been killed and resurrected at
least twice a decade since the 70’s.
Looking
back at history, there too we find the concept of fictional canon is notable
mainly for its total nonexistence. Disney’s efforts to the contrary, there is
no one single, canonical version of any of the fairy tales, nor of Achilles, nor
King Arthur. There’s evidently nothing inherent in fiction that requires or
demands that there be a canon.
Plenty
of modern properties also ignore the whole concept altogether—there’s no Mad
Max canon, although some have tried to write one, Doctor Who’s time-traveling
shenanigans make mincemeat of the very concept at anything but the most basic
level, Dungeons and Dragons novels largely get around the concept by having enough
alternate worlds to give Schrodinger’s cat an anxiety attack.
While
there are sound storytelling, narrative objectives in ensuring consistency
among your various story lines, it’s not hard to see there are less pure
motives at work, too.
There
are obvious commercial reasons for the property holders’ love of promoting the
idea canon. Together with copyright, it is one more lever that ensures they
maintain control of, and can profit from, the shared universe. Property holders
alone get to determine what counts and what doesn’t, giving their own products
a seal of legitimacy and banishing all others to the despised realm of fan fiction.
Gatekeeping
is another obvious motive. Collecting, memorizing and categorizing facts makes
a lot of people comfortable, gives them a sense of order and control that is
otherwise often missing from our lives. Knowledge of canon can be used to browbeat
other fans and make yourself feel smarter, more important in whatever fan
community you’re a part of. So it’s rooted in insecurity and fear, too.
The
good news is, I think the idea of canon is going to wither away slowly but
surely. The most popular franchises at the moment, Marvel and Star Wars and Star
Trek, are all reaching the limits of what they can do within a single,
supposedly internally consistent continuity. Star Trek has already rebooted
both its movies and streaming properties (calling it a TV show sounds
anachronistic now, doesn’t it?) New Star Wars properties sound like they’ll be
set in different time periods, precisely to get away from problems with canon.
The original actors in Marvel movies are reaching the ends of their contracts.
You
see long-term, canon is simply unsustainable. I’m a fan of the BattleTech games
that have been around since the 80s, and my God, the canon is a useless mess. It
just accretes, gathers more and more mass, weighing down everything about the
property until you can’t write anything new about anything in this universe. It
calcifies everything, ossifies it, fossilizes it. Nothing new can be done,
nothing can grow. It kills the property.
As
we move more and more into more oral styles of storytelling, I think this will
accelerate the trend. We’ll want the same stories retold over and over, which
will kill the whole purpose of canon.
It’s
time for canon to end.

To be blunt: The financial appraisal of "canon" is that it has significant real-life-dollars worth, A LOT of dollars. You touch on this point briefly but only see it through a creative lens, whereas the facts are otherwise. So no, it won't end. Not until society stops saying "I can charge money for this fictional idea, but you cannot" and that won't ever happen, for good reason.
ReplyDeleteThat really is all it boils down to, you know.